If
java disabled or no main menu showing above - use links
below.
|
The
whole process of buying a new digital camera is far
from easy - with so many parameters to consider. I am
adding this page to provide some examples of useful
sites where camera reviews can be found.
After those .... just some more thoughts as to what
may or may not matter with your choices. Excuse any
repetition. |
''Digital
Preview'' .....
A useful source of information, sometimes also including
comparisons between very similar models. They seem to
cover all makes and also comment on accessories.
''Digital
Camera Resource'' ......
Many useful reviews, including references to memory,
batteries etc. Also links and buyer's guide.
''Imaging
Resource'' .......
Reviews, photo lessons, a forum and up to date news
on the market. Plenty of other information too on ancillary
equipment. There appear to be some useful ''hot deal''
links also.
"MegaPixel.net''
......
Click on the ''Reviews'' link on left of that site's
page. They use a drop-down box approach for search,
targeting of camera by manufacturer, model, or MegPixel
rating.
"PC
Photo Review" .......
Latest Reviews, Latest Products, Reviews by Manufacturer
- including an alphabetical Manufacture look-up choice.
|
Let's look a bit further,
or again, at points to re-consider, which we will assume
is after you have set some sort of budget. I would remind
again that buying too cheap is for the most part counter
productive, and best if you can begin from about the
$250 position. $500 will greatly expand your choices
and once above $1,000 then you into some very useful
gear! The most expensive I have seen currently is about
$8,000! |
I had the chance
to try out a Fuji S7000, which you can get for
around $500 if shopping around. It had excellent
features in almost all respects ... BUT ....
despite seeming wonderful value and 6.1 MegaPixels
... all pics were taken at 72 DPI. That was
the bad news!
Why? ... simply because if any reduction made
to the image for using in posts, or even a section
''cropped out'', then you can be stuck with
a very ''blocky'' or ''pixilated'' result. A
highlight along an edge for example would appear
like a staircase!!
So - I would stress, whatever level you are
looking at, do try and find a camera that uses
150 DPI or better - even if of a lower MegaPixel
figure, because you will rarely need to post
much bigger than 640x480 anyway!
Zoom .......
Just a reminder .... optical is the way to go,
simply because digital zoom really is no more
than a ''cropping'' of your image. A range of
3:1 is useful, but somewhere nearer to 6:1 is
better, plus a macro facility is useful for
close up work (cartridge headstamps perhaps!).
Lens Options ........
If you go far enough up the price scale then
you can get closer to an SLR camera (Single
Lens Reflex) .... which does allow either lens
changes or, add-ons. This of course means buying
extra optics but this can be useful, depending
on what you plan to be photographing.
Flash ......
A reminder to check what flash options a camera
gives. I would recommend knowing if it uses
single or double flash (the first might be used
for white balance setting) ... because if you
need a flash slave unit later, you must know
which you have. I favor single. Also, it is
useful to be able to turn off the on-camera
flash, as well as be able to set it to a low
''fill-in'' level.
Memory .......
I have previously recommended compact flash,
and still do because I reckon you get more memory
for the money. Other formats now though are
less of a problem because card readers for USB
connection are now widely available. Some cameras
offer an option to use an IBM micro drive ...
whereby now you can go up to 4 Gigabytes storage!
Not really needed for most of us, when a 128Mb
memory card will more than suffice.
Power Supply .......
Some cameras only offer a single inbuilt Lithium
Ion battery ...... great for capacity but, expensive
to replace. Add to that the need to recharge
''in situ'' perhaps and not necessarily too
convenient if power runs out in the field! If
at all possible, choose a camera which takes
2 or 4 NiMH AA cells .... these are high capacity
rechargeables, and by having more than one set
you can be well set up for covering most contingencies.
Other lesser factors ........
DIN
options .........
Not too important but does give more flexibility
over quality and exposure under awkward conditions.
White Balance .......
Many cameras now feature auto select on this,
but some offer manual control as well. It
is useful to see if a particular camera can
handle white balance adjustment for use of
fluorescent and tungsten lighting in particular.
Auto vs Manual ......
Most times with modern sophistication, a camera
can be used for almost ''auto everything''.
However, options for manual control greatly
extend a camera's usefulness. The ability
to focus manually is very handy, as well as
being able to select manual exposure settings.
This is often covered by a camera having ''shutter
priority'' and ''aperture priority'' options
- all the better to handle some more tricky
subjects See mention in Photofacts
regarding this subject.
Delayed Action Release ....
Most cameras have this .... but it is useful
because if long exposures needed where a tripod
should be used, it helps negate the possible
effects of shutter button actuation still
causing camera movement - and so ''camera
shake'' blur. You would set the delay ...
press shutter and wait a few seconds for it
to take the shot.
Any further smaller
features that have been omitted or forgotten
will be added later but hopefully this covers
the major ones.
|
Now
- you will be lucky to find all the features
you want in the one camera but, plenty of
research does help narrow down the choices.
It is better to sacrifice minor features (even
if attractive gimmicks), and concentrate instead
on the important features such as have been
discussed.
|
|
Back to Top
|